About Me

In writing the "About Me" portion of this blog I thought about the purpose of the blog - namely, preventing the growth of Socialism & stopping the Death Of Democracy in the American Republic & returning her to the "liberty to abundance" stage of our history. One word descriptions of people's philosophies or purposes are quite often inadequate. I feel that I am "liberal" meaning that I am broad minded, independent, generous, hospitable, & magnanimous. Under these terms "liberal" is a perfectly good word that has been corrupted over the years to mean the person is a left-winger or as Mark Levin more accurately wrote in his book "Liberty & Tyranny" a "statist" - someone looking for government or state control of society. I am certainly not that & have dedicated the blog to fighting this. I believe that I find what I am when I consider whether or not I am a "conservative" & specifically when I ask what is it that I am trying to conserve? It is the libertarian principles that America was founded upon & originally followed. That is the Return To Excellence that this blog is named for & is all about.

Sunday, June 11, 2017

An Analysis - Preventing Future Islamic Terror Attacks

  click on image to enlarge
It is the above type of political correctness by Pope Francis that will result in the universal domination of Islam & Sharia Law & the establishment of a worldwide caliphate – expanding Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's current self proclaimed caliphate – declared on June 29, 2014 - of the Islamic State of Iraq, Syria, & beyond of which al-Baghdadi is the elected caliph.
See map below - yellow shows current territory in Iraq & Syria controlled by Islamic State (IS, ISIS, ISIL – one & the same).  The map does not include Islamic State controlled territories in Libya, Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, or Nigeria.
click on map to enlarge
Consider the Pope's unnecessary capitulation to the evil of Islamic fascists to that of the contrived tiresome pronouncements of politicians, who after every senseless Islamic attack, respond with mealy mouthed words like Congressman Frelinghuysen uttered a few days ago following the atrocities in Manchester & Kabul – "We all strongly condemn these attacks and renew our pledge to stand shoulder to shoulder with our allies to defeat this unspeakable evil at its source."  Blah, blah, blah.  How many times must innocent people, smart enough to wonder when their number will be called, have to hear this type of empty, trite, clichéd way with words before they realize that our elected representatives – other than Trump - really don't want to take positive proactive steps to rid the world of Islamic fascists & the terror tactics they use.
The above type of faux "strong" words that we hear after every Islamic terrorist attack amount to nothing – they are worthless, meaningless, insincere repetitions that really are disrespectful & condescending.  They do nothing to prevent future attacks.
Of course it is not just American politicians who are petrified to properly address the Islamic terror problem.  The UK's prime minister Theresa May's statement after the Manchester bombing emphasized another tired refrain that such attacks "will not break us".  This prompted English singer-songwriter Morrissey to point out that the bombing will not break Prime Minister May because she lives in a bullet-proof bubble & did not know any of the young people taken to the Manchester morgues for identification – these people are already broken.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan, himself a Muslim, said "London is united with Manchester" - but he does not condemn Islamic State - who have claimed responsibility for the bombing.  Following the June 3 London Bridge attack Mayor Khan said "I condemn these terrorists in the strongest possible terms . . . we will never be cowed by terrorism."  Sound disingenuously all too familiar?
And then Manchester mayor Andy Burnham says the Manchester attack was carried out by an "extremist" – which prompted Morrissey to mockingly ask "An extreme what? An extreme rabbit?"
Politically correct politicians, like all the people mentioned above, always explain that Islam is a religion of peace after the latest murder, attempted murder, or execution by beheading by people who claim Muslim affiliation.

These types of politicians always point out that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful as if this proves something. 


How do we know the true followers of Islam are the peaceful ones?  Just because they are peaceful?  This could prove to be a fool's interpretation.  A thorough study of Islam, the Quran, & the Hadith is needed to know which ones are following Islam & which ones are not.


Since 9/11 Americans have learned far too well that Islam is a fascist ideology that tolerates no other opinion or belief in the world, not only of religion, but also of political & legal systems.  Greg Woods, writing in the WSJ, points out that "Muhammad wasn't only a prophet, he was chief of state, supreme judge, & top general of the army of conquest.  He presided over an entire system of law called Sharia."


It is Muslim's belief in Sharia law that we should focus on because according to Pew Research done in 2013 32% of Muslims in America believe that Sharia should be the supreme law of the land – not the Constitution which Muslims swear an allegiance to during the citizenship process; 51% told the Polling Company in June 2015 they preferred having "the choice of being governed according to Sharia;" & 60% of Muslim-Americans under 30 told Pew they're more loyal to Islam than America.  One of the tenets of Sharia is that it is permissible to lie to gain an advantage for Islam.


It is Sharia law that makes it impossible for Muslims to assimilate into another country or culture & is the reason that Muslims intend to dominate the world.


Sharia law is the basis of Islamic terrorists' murderous acts who, in the name of Allah shout "Allahu Akbar" (Allah the greatest) during their onslaughts to reaffirm whatever is happening is in accordance with Allah's will.  They leave messages citing chapter & verse from the Quran to justify their actions that show their love for Allah & their enthusiasm, eagerness, & determination to do Allah's will.


Some tenets of Sharia law include: 1) the denial (or criticizing) of any part of the Quran is punishable by death, 2) a man can beat his wife for insubordination, 3) women wear clothing that covers them head to foot except for the eyes (this also conceals bruises & deformation from beatings), 4) women cannot drive cars, 5) a Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death, 6) homosexuals are put to death (most often by being thrown from buildings & more recently being caned in Banda Aceh, Indonesia last month), & 7) Muslims should engage in Taqiyya (a form of Muslim deception) & lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.


The above clear explanation of Sharia law, & the examples of the kind of draconian principles it entails, shows the brilliance of Trump's magnificent speech in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on May 21 – the first stop in his first foreign trip as president.  Prior to the trip Trump had built a strong relationship with Saudi Arabia based on the two countries mutual concerns about terrorist destruction by Islamic State (Sunni) & Iran (Shia).


The Saudis had invited the leaders of 50 Sunni Muslim countries to hear the speech in which Trump challenged these leaders of Muslim nations to become partners with the United States in driving Islamic terrorists "out of this earth."  Trump asked them to reduce, destroy, & prevent "the crisis of Islamic extremism, & the Islamists, & Islamic terror of all kinds."


There is already evidence that some of these countries have been emboldened by Trump's presence & remarks in that Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the U.A.E., Bahrain, & others have identified Qatar as a financial funder of terrorism specifically mentioning Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, & being sympathetic to Iran.  Several Middle East countries have cut diplomatic ties with Qatar prompting Trump to tweet: "During my recent trip to the Middle East I stated that there can no longer be funding of Radical Ideology.  Leaders pointed to Qatar – Look!  So good to see the Saudi Arabia visit with the King & 50 countries already paying off.  They said they would take a hard line on funding extremism, & all reference was pointing to Qatar.  Perhaps this will be the beginning of the end to the horror of terrorism."


click on photo to enlarge


Ever since the Islamic terror attacks in America on 9/11 Americans have asked why Muslims who do not participate in terrorism do not @ least condemn the violent acts – there is an implied non-approval by non-violent Muslims but no real satisfactory answer & certainly no vociferous condemnation. 


As indicated above Trump has called out the leaders of 50 Sunni Muslim nations to rid Islamic terrorism from their own countries which, if they do, will answer the above question in each country.  Trump explained to these leaders: "This is not a battle between different faiths, different sects, or different civilizations.  This is a battle between barbaric criminals who seek to obliterate human life, & decent people of all religions who seek to protect it."


Meanwhile since the Manchester & Kabul attacks the U.K. suffered its third Islamic terror attack in 72 days when three Muslim terrorists drove a rented white van into pedestrians on the London Bridge before knifing their way into the Borough Market pub & restaurant area where they were shot & killed by police.  The Islamic terrorists cried "This is for Allah" during the rampage that killed eight people & injured forty eight – 15 of whom are still in critical condition.


This time Prime Minister May said the tolerance of Islamist extremism had gone too far in the U.K. admitting that "it is time to say enough is enough."  Not intending to be flippant but wasn't the bombing @ the pop concert in Manchester on May 22 "enough" or the attack on the Westminster Bridge on March 22 "enough"?


All three of the 2017 Islamic terror attacks in the U.K. have involved terrorists who had been under law enforcement surveillance @ one time or another.  In the London Bridge case Khuram Shazad Butt had not only been under surveillance but he had appeared in a documentary on the BBC in 2016 that called for Islamic law (Sharia) in the U.K.  In addition, two years ago, a neighbor had notified authorities of potential dangers with Butt's suspicious activities.  So much for "if you see something say something" in the U.K.


The problem is that there are over 20,000 people listed as "subjects of interest" in terror in the U.K. with 3,000 being under active investigation to some degree – supposedly.  Virtually an impossible job.


Two thirds of Muslims living in the U.K. say they would not report any suspicious terror activities if they became aware of them thereby casting their loyalty with the terrorists instead of the decent people of the U.K. – source Nigel Farage.  Returning to a famous quote from sixteen years ago: "You are either with us or you are with the terrorists."


Now Prime Minister May has said she plans to ramp up anti-terrorism methods but all of the methods she has suggested so far still wreak of political correctness - avoiding hard truths so as not to offend the people around you – in this case avoiding making the obvious connection between Islam & barbaric violence. 


William Kilpatrick, writing for Crisis Magazine, provides the following list, that make up a solid foundation, of steps to take in preventing the type of Islamic terror attacks of the past several years: "surveilling mosques, madrassas, & Muslim student associations, deporting radical imams, shutting down radical mosques & schools, closing Sharia courts, closing radical Islamist political organizations, banning foreign funding of mosques, stopping the radicalization of Muslims in the prison system, preventing the return of foreign fighters from places like Syria and Libya, &—the big one—calling a halt to Muslim immigration."


I hasten to add to the above list the eradication of Muslim no-go zones (enclaves) which are so dangerous that police are afraid to enter them.  The main European terror targets - Germany, Belgium, France, & England, all with weak immigration laws – have large concentrations of Muslims, who have no intention of assimilating, in many locations & this atmosphere makes it ripe for terrorism to breed including the formation of no go zones.  Countries like Hungary, Poland, & the Czech Republic have strict immigration laws & have suffered no major terror attacks to date.


Check the graphic below for Muslim enclaves in the U.S.  Click here to learn how these enclaves form in the U.S.  Click here to watch Dennis Michael Lynch take a tour of Dearborn,  Michigan – a city of nearly 100,000 people, 40% of whom are Arab Americans.  Dearborn has the largest proportion of Arab Americans in the U.S.


  Click on image to enlarge


This post is not intended to discriminate or profile but rather to urge using our experience & common sense – nothing can be more foolish than to allow our Constitution, laws, moral standards, & values to be used as weapons against us by exploitative Islamic terrorists - to our ultimate capitulation & demise.  Europe provides a good example of what is coming to America unless we change our approach to the worldwide Islamic fascist offensive & exercise our own offensive as outlined above.


A good place to start with our new approach would be to ask, & find out, what kind of religion would inspire & permit Mohammad Atta & Marwan al-Shehhi to say they were practicing their religion by flying airplanes into buildings.  To me this is not a religion @ all. 


Reference post:  The Problem With Sharia Law For Non-Muslim Countries



  1. I do not see his wall coming down, nor an invitation for them to live inside.

  2. As usual this post is well written.

    To get rid of terrorists, you need to go to war, and that might not stop them from re-appearing years later. I would say the majority of people in U.S. are against going to war. For past 25 years or so have been engaged in wars, no clear cut victory.

    I remember President Roosevelt was inclined to help England in their war with Germany. He even sent them about 50 U.S. naval vessels, he want to go to war, but knew American people were against it. FDR tried to use any tactic to help England, and also used transports to send materials, supplies to Russia.

    As fate would have it, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and now the American people wanted blood, and Congress declared war on Japan and a week or so later on Germany.

    If Japan did not attack, good chance England would have fallen to Germany, as many Americans were against going to war, but after Pearl Harbor they wanted to get into the war.

    I believe German generals knew the game was over as they could not bomb U.S. (distance too great) and America was large industrial country.

    Fate has a strange way of doing things, what if???

    Next threat - North Korea. They have A SIMPLE PERSON, WHO IS NOT MATURE running the country. How do we handle that situation?

    1. Just like WWII - we may not have the luxury of fighting one @ a time.

  3. I agree - I think the Holy Father does not want to incite war, nor does the Dali Lama and other religious leaders. I think Jesus would call the Islamic terrorists out!

  4. Many American "Globalists" feel US has been major destabilizing glasslike force. Hence, they are more tolerant of global terrorists, and push goal of global government, socialism while weakening US militarily and economically. Trump must drain the swamp of globalist still in our Government and change thus mindset.