About Me

In writing the "About Me" portion of this blog I thought about the purpose of the blog - namely, preventing the growth of Socialism & stopping the Death Of Democracy in the American Republic & returning her to the "liberty to abundance" stage of our history. One word descriptions of people's philosophies or purposes are quite often inadequate. I feel that I am "liberal" meaning that I am broad minded, independent, generous, hospitable, & magnanimous. Under these terms "liberal" is a perfectly good word that has been corrupted over the years to mean the person is a left-winger or as Mark Levin more accurately wrote in his book "Liberty & Tyranny" a "statist" - someone looking for government or state control of society. I am certainly not that & have dedicated the blog to fighting this. I believe that I find what I am when I consider whether or not I am a "conservative" & specifically when I ask what is it that I am trying to conserve? It is the libertarian principles that America was founded upon & originally followed. That is the Return To Excellence that this blog is named for & is all about.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

The Income Tax System Explained in Beer

Thanks to a long time subscriber for sending us the example below of how our income tax system works – using ten men who want to pay their beer bill the way we pay our income taxes.
 
The Income Tax System Explained in Beer
 
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our income taxes, it would go something like this…
 
The first four men (the lowest income earners) would pay nothing
The fifth would pay $1
The sixth would pay $3
The seventh would pay $7
The eighth would pay $12
The ninth would pay $18
The tenth man (the highest income earner) would pay $59
So, that's what they decided to do.
 
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.″  Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.
 
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our income taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
 
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
 
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the income tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
 
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
 
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.
 
"I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,"but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!"
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that is how our income tax system works. The people who already pay the highest income taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
 
 

Friday, August 24, 2012

The Best Of Times Video

Thanks to two long time subscribers & former co-workers for sending this video that is a lot of fun.   It shows the best of times for many of us.

Monday, August 20, 2012

Two Visions Of America

"I want to congratulate Mr. Ryan.  I know him, I welcome him to the race.  He is a decent man, he is a family man, he is an articulate spokesman for Gov. Romney's vision, but it is a vision that I fundamentally disagree with."  BO
 
"...we won't replace our founding principles, we will reapply them."  Paul Ryan on August 11, 2012 during his acceptance speech to be the VP nominee of the GOP
 
 
A comparison of the above two quotes & a look @ the above bar graph clearly shows the fundamental difference between BO/Biden & Romney/Ryan.  The bar graph displays the essence of BO's government-dependent vision.  It shows the increase of 13-million Americans receiving some form of federal welfare during the first two & one half years of BO's presidency.  Ryan's vision of reapplying our founding principles will reverse this trend – by definition.
 
The good news for most of us is that BO can no longer hide behind false or misleading statements about his record because Ryan's addition to Mitt's ticket forces BO to discuss the issues – the question is do enough people care about the issues or do they prefer to be a statistic on the bar graph? 
 
Start by asking yourself how many people represented on the bar graph will vote against BO. The majority of these people are not interested in any of the numerous substantive reasons why BO should not be reelected – they will discount, ignore, or not care about any intellectual or substantive discussion Ryan presents so they can reelect BO thereby ensuring their own meager pitiful subsistence continues.  Our best bet is if most of them don't vote @ all – but we are working against a community organizer par excellence & if he ever gets these large numbers of people organized the country will change overnight instead of gradually or incrementally as BO has had to accept in his first term.
 
A very dear friend offered an example of what we can do to fight the numbers problem described above when she called to let me know that her sister & niece visited her recently.  She knows that both of them intend to vote for BO so the last day of their visit she started questioning them about the wisdom of this choice & plans to continue this discussion now that she has put some doubt in their minds.  She also wanted me to know she is having similar discussions with people in the senior citizen community where she lives.  She also does similar good work for America @ the local level.
 
Another subscriber in another state let me know that her family is not very happy with their local candidates so I suggested that she support any of the candidates highlighted on this blog over the past several months.  Contact Jim DeMint (202-224-6121) for Senate candidates or Rob Woodall (770-963-2420)  for House candidates – both have their own list of people across the country who could use support.
 
If we all are not finding & changing the votes of two & preferably three people who plan to vote for statist candidates we may be in trouble just based on the raw numbers.
 
Twice in the last six presidential elections the voting age population exceeded the actual number of voters by over 100-million people (in 2008 it was 75-million people) – source author Andy Andrews.
 
The electorate (60% of the voting age population who votes) is very evenly split but BO has an advantage in that he has a larger target in trying to pick off more of the aforementioned 75-million non voters. 
 
Look @ the other graph above entitled Federal Government Dependence Spending Now Higher Than Disposable Income to see how that momentum has been going – as if the title of the graph doesn't tell you.