click on graphic to enlarge
  Now that income tax filing day has come & gone many people   wonder where their tax dollars went.  The above graphic provides the   breakdown detailing the allocation of federal revenue received in fiscal year 2013 & in so doing gives people a chance to see how   they would reduce the annual budget deficit themselves – I'm sure Paul Ryan   would appreciate the help.  
  The fiscal year 2013 budget deficit was $680 billion dollars –   it is portrayed on the above breakdown as $24.50 for every $100 paid in federal   taxes (income, payroll, corporate, & excise).  See note @ bottom of   breakdown.
  What line items would you cut or would you raise taxes to   reduce the $24.50 in borrowing costs for every $100 paid?  For those who   choose the raising of taxes method please be aware that Professor Friedman liked   to say that "to spend is to tax" meaning that in the case of borrowing   it has to be repaid plus interest from tax revenue sooner or later.  By   preferring to raise taxes to lower borrowing costs you are just deciding to tax   sooner rather than later.
  Also with regard to the interest line item - it is projected   to double to 12% in the next ten years after interest rates return to more   normal levels from the Fed's artificially manipulated interest rates of the past   many years.  This projection provides a clear picture of the Fed giving up   its independence to work as an agency of the Treasury.
  My own method of deficit reduction has been listed on RTE   several times over the years.  In summary, there are   four points that will bring America's financial house in order & accordingly will restore the prosperity that has been   cruelly ripped from us by BO - 1) repeal ObamaCare & implement a premium support plan for Medicare   based on Ryan's initial proposal that turns the cost curve down for generations   to come while preserving current programs for people 55 & over, 2) follow   Susan Lee's solution for controlling Social Security's growth by reducing the   initial benefit for people under 55 so that the initial benefit is calculated   based on the CPI rate instead of the wage rate as it is now, 3) begin Ken   Blackwell's "cut, cap, & balance" plan that cuts projected borrowing in half   next year (not 10 years from now) & caps spending @ 18% of GDP (it has   averaged over 22% since 2009), & 4) enact the FairTax Plan.
  Now it is obvious that none of the above points will be done   until after the 2016 presidential election, if then.  But the midterm   election gives us a chance to elect congressmen & senators who we can work   with to build a financial foundation for America & start a change in mindset   that embraces such measures.  If this takes hold we may even have a chance   to defeat the statists in 2016.  The solutions are there – all we need are   the will & sense to follow through. 
  In the meantime click on Tax Freedom Day to   see how to determine the date the nation as a whole has earned enough money to   pay its tax bill (federal, state, & local) for the year.  Tax Freedom   Day in 2014 is April 21 meaning that the average American draws the first dollar   he could use for himself on April 22; when you add the effects of federal   borrowing the date becomes May 6.  The link also shows how the FairTax will   reduce these days to something more manageable – my target is 12:01 AM on   January 1 of each year.
  
Hi Doug - In terms of cutting items from the budgets the decision has already been made. BO took a page out of Bill Clinton’s playbook – gut the military. Liberals hate the military.
ReplyDeleteIn terms of tax freedom day, Charles Payne of Fox Business News says, we work eight hours per day for four hours pay. My grandmother would say, “It’s the government’s money they can take it back anytime they want”. Whatever philosophy you subscribe to, the Government is taking their money back at a record pace with impunity.
Doug - I think a better chart would have the "For every $100 paid" have the total come to $124.50. Interesting to note that you could zero out either military, social security or health care and still not balance the budget.
ReplyDeleteSaw in the paper today that Hillary would beat all GOP challengers. When you have 50% of the voters being supported by the government (and able to vote themselves a raise), those few who actually pay taxes can't overcome the sheer numbers.
How 'bout this for an idea: If you are being paid by the government (including SSI, welfare, gov't employee of any sort, etc just to be fair) you are entitled to 3/5 of a vote. It would be the 'penalty' for living off the government. I know it doesn't stand a snow balls chance, but it has been done before....
JM's second paragraph describes "Death Of Democracy" to a tee.
DeleteVery well written and informative. To get your message thru to the "masses" needs advertising - newspapers, TV, Internet, Radio,etc. This costs money - lots of it. True you can reach thousands without the above help, but you still
ReplyDeleteneed millions more.
I salute you in your determination and honest effort. It's an uphill battle, that can be won - "when?" is the key question.
Many in Congress agree with you, but are afraid to say so, for one reason or another.
Its a bitter and tough battle you have taken on and my own thoughts are GOOD LUCK. Hopefully it bears "fruit" and succeeds.
Thanks for those kind words & recognizing what RTE is trying to do. There is nothing wrong with America that a little help & mindset change won't cure.
DeleteWhat line items to cut from the chart? Ask the Founding Fathers - they would say all of them except defense. I wish that Americans would wake up and understand that all this spending is destroying our country and their own spirits. I remember hearing Sir James Goldsmith on Lou Dobbs' Moneyline show in the early 1990's say "Americans have lost their nerve." That was over 20 years ago - he saw the deterioration then.
ReplyDeleteThanks TLG for raising the constitutional point about the entire budget. The Founders would honor interest payments but would want to reduce them I'm sure. Same for congressional salaries.
DeleteRegarding the Fair Tax: we need to shift the focus big time on lobbyists. the tax breaks and special complex and long tax regulations they get passed have at best dubious benefits to economic growth. Once exposed these special tax treatments will not be so sacred. Then the odds of Fair Tax passage will increase significantly.
ReplyDelete