"Doug - Now GOP better work smart & pass pro market   legislation even if vetoed. They must make case for the private economy and I   hope the FairTax soon. Need great communicators. McConnell is weak in this." –   Our Wall Street Finance VP.
  "I'm just watching the talking heads on all the news outlets. They seem to be like politicians as they can say anything they want & are not held accountable. However a loud & clear message has been sent to BO. Now let's see if this latest batch of gutless politicians are any better that the last ones (I doubt it)." – My brother-in-law.
"I was wrong in predicting Republicans would lose the   election.  I thought BO would make a big push for   Hispanics to vote - he did not.  I thought he would   make immigration an issue - he did not.  I thought   people would remember Republicans were not doing anything positive in Congress -   people forgot that.  Do not be surprised in the next   election if Democrats win – assuming that Republicans pass   bills that cater to the rich & ignore the general population." – The Historian.
  The above three messages, received from long time subscribers   to RTE, are   representative of the uneasiness that people in general view the results of   Tuesday's midterm elections. 
  After the House Republican freshman class of 2010 capitulated   within three months of taking their oath of office in January 2011 we have every   reason to be uneasy again.  The 2010 midterm did not set a reassuring   precedent – see Only 21 Of 87   Freshman House Republicans Are Still With You for   details.
  We start this time with the contradictory Mitch McConnell, the   presumed new Senate majority leader, not making us feel better when, during a   debate with his feckless opponent the week before the election, he endorsed   Kentucky Kynect, the ObamaCare website in Kentucky that has been used by over   400,000 people to sign up for ObamaCare – mostly through the Medicaid expansion   feature of the law.  Although Mitch assures us that he wants to tear out   ObamaCare "root & branch" his endorsement of the website is disconcerting   & I am scared to death that it is an indication of more contradictions to   come.  
  It is true that the majority of 2014 Senate midterms were held   in Republican home-court states, defined as states that BO lost in 2012, which   put most Senate Democrats @ a disadvantage.  But the real story of the   midterms was the record low turnout & the profile of that turnout that has   allowed one fifth of the voting eligible population to make such a strong   statement against BO.  The pre-election polls that called for one squeaker   after another missed the low turnout, meaning they thought more Democrats would   vote than actually did.  See graph below for turnout.
  The electorate in 2014 was "far whiter,   more male, older, & angrier" than in 2008 & 2012 when BO won the   presidency.  Seventy five percent of the electorate was white in   2014.  This profile of the electorate may never be repeated in a winning   combination for Republicans as the share of white voters declines & older   voters die.  For instance Democrats won the under 45 vote, the   female vote, & the Black & Latino vote but Republicans won the 45 &   over vote with heavy influence by both those white voters over 65 & male   voters.  Click here to see the entire breakdown.  
  Turnout is measured in three ways: 1) as the   percent of actual voters to those who were registered, 2) the percent of voters   to the voting age population (VAP) , & 3) the most accurate measurement -   the percent of voters to those eligible to vote – the voting-eligible population   (VEP).
  The 2014 midterm VEP was 36.6% versus 40.9% in   the 2010 midterm.  Only twelve of the fifty states turned out a higher   percentage of eligible voters in 2014 than in 2010.
  In raw numbers this means that 83 million   people voted in 2014 & 144 million people eligible to vote did not   vote.  Now if the turnout in 2016 is the normal 60% presidential turnout   then @ least another 53 million people will vote in 2016 – not counting   population growth.  This means the profile of the electorate in 2016 will   be substantially different from the one that voted last week.    
  Republican pundits like Laura Ingraham   & Ann Coulter took comfort that statewide candidates in Texas (44% gov &   48% senate) & Georgia (47% gov & 42% senate) scored over 40% with Latino   voters - but the overall percentage of Latino support for Republicans is under   40% which is not enough to win a national election & is actually down from   the 2010 midterm election so we can't say that Latinos broke for   Republicans.  See Pew Research Center graphic below – notice the Latino gap   actually increased from 22% in 2010 to 26% in 2014.
  The small total   electorate in 2014 will expand in 2016 – the 2014 electorate consisted of people   who were responsible & motivated to vote.  The 2016 electorate will   include the Latinos, Blacks, Asians, & single women who need a presidential   figure to lure them to the polls with the idea of getting something for   nothing.  "These are entitlement seeking voters strongly lured to vote for what   keeps them in the same place - not developing their talents, not seeking new and   more promising employment opportunities; rather many just desire a continuation   of entitlements, oblivious that continued policies will soon jeopardize these   entitlements" writes our Wall Street Finance   VP.
  It   took six years before enough people finally realized that their own government   was purposely being made the enemy to their way of life under BO's policies –   thus the rejection of the Democrat candidates last Tuesday for the most   part.  People voted against the status quo because the status quo had   become so egregious for Republicans & Independents while Democrats stayed   home because they saw BO's promises of hope had been hollow all   along.
  People saw through false issues like the Republican "war on women" to the   point that one losing Democrat candidate was labeled "Mark Uterus."  The   insincerity of the Democrat campaigns was best illustrated though by Michelle   Obama when she campaigned in Iowa for a person she did not know.  Click   here to hear MO finally being corrected after giving out a fictitious   website that has now grown in mock   popularity.
  Nevertheless   for now BO will be slowed down & Republicans have a chance – but a chance   for what?
  Many   pundits have told Republicans to go slow or to present bills that BO has to sign   or if he vetoes them he will show how Harry Reid has protected him from   governing during his entire presidency.
  That   is fine as far as it goes but it is a complete mindset change from dependency to   freedom that is needed & the Republicans have the chance to make it   happen.
  To   turn the country around the newly elected Republicans have to show that the   problem with America is not economic but political.  In this regard they   must unleash the free enterprise system so that businesses are no longer seen as   the enemy but rather the way to prosperity especially for the much maligned   middle class.  They have to show that the Federal Reserve, in cahoots with   BO, is swindling Americans @ the median income level out of $1,000 per year in   purchasing power with their seemingly benign policy of 2% inflation each   year.
  They have to change the mindset expressed by Hillary Clinton when she   said that businesses do not create jobs.  Republicans have to explain what a job really is under a free   enterprise system – namely, an opportunity to create more present or future   value for an employer than it costs to maintain the worker in the job.  If   the employee's value drops below the cost of maintaining the employee the job   disappears & that of course includes minimum wage   jobs.
  It   must be pointed out that none of BO's policies create one job that results in   wealth creation - how do you create sustainable wealth-producing jobs by taxing   income?  How do small businesses expand when you increase taxes?  What   economic freedom principles are enhanced when you raise taxes?    
  Republicans have the chance to go back to basics & govern like they   really believe it – that the general Welfare of the United States is best served   by people – men & women, homosexual & straight, Hispanic, Black, &   Asian, – working in the cooperation that is the free market capitalistic system   – this is the inclusive message that they never clearly deliver.  America's   brightest future will be realized when all of the really unclever gamesmanships   that BO & the Democrats play are not just put aside but are unmasked as the   domestic enemy of America that has infected our country with the clear intent of   ruining everyone's chance @ the American dream.  Republicans have to show   government dependent Democrats – "Romney's 47%" of the people who are dependent   on government, believe they are victims entitled to government handouts, &   pay no income tax - that they are not getting anywhere.  Republicans have   to positively reach these people to improve their lives with free market   policies they undertake.
  We have   to face that something different happened in November 2008 & it was   confirmed in 2012 – & that something is evil & a deliberate deception to   overrun our country.  The last six years has not been about the usual sort   of things the two parties argue over & take turns winning elections   over.  These years have been about robbing liberty from people by   increasing dependency on government & promoting destructive class warfare   & envy & there was no end in sight to this nightmare until last Tuesday   & no foreseeable practical solution other than for those of us who still   believe in America to teach & live the libertarian principles that our   country was founded upon.  Start with the thought of freedom & explain   that all prosperity comes from unleashing the free human intellect.  If we   lose with that message all is lost anyway @ least until John Galt comes   forth.
  


Boils down to what the Republicans do the next few months. If they grow a pair (seriously doubtful that they will) they may have a chance at rebuilding their party.
ReplyDeleteThe fear is that Boehner, McConnell and the gang actually believe that they are the reason for the GOP's victory. That they don't realize the reason for the victory is the public's disgust with Obama and his policies.
We will find out shortly if they are serious and have learned from the past. Boehner stated they will hold a vote on defunding Obama Care. Which means the media and the Democrats will challenge them with the question: "What plan do they have to replace it (Obama Care) with?
If the Republican response is on of the following;
a) silence,
b) some vague generalities of the "market" taking care of it (without a thorough explanation)
c) go back to the old "system"
the Republicans will be doomed and we will know they have learned nothing.
Their response should be concise, swift and to the point namely, everyone gets to open a health savings account, self funded or through their employer. They will have the opportunity to purchase a "catastrophic" in the open market from any insurance company they desire in the United States.
Any other medical expenses may be paid from their HSA to their Health Care Professional.
By taking the offensive and showing how this type of plan will bring down health care costs they can win the public relations battle. Whether they have the brains and the courage to do it is another matter.
PS: I don't think the last 6 years have been any different than the past. It just has been a speeding up of politicians buying votes and influence. It has been building in the nation for the last 80 years and the other side believes they have enough momentum and votes to be more open about it. Remember buying votes always leads to more power for politicians. I don't buy that older Democrat leaders such as LBJ, Jimmy Carter Tom Foley and George Mitchell etc were any different than the current crop. They simply lead the way to soften up the public. Buying votes is no different than the drug pusher hooking their prey.
ReplyDeleteDoug - kudos to your excellent and deep post analysis of the midterm elections. I especially am motivated with your conclusion that "all prosperity comes from unleashing the free human intellect". This is an argument we must and can win. Let us remind our friends and relatives of the numerous historical examples where free markets and individual ingenuity created new industries, jobs and improved our way of life. Contrast that with failed experiments with Communism, socialism and even European welfare states. Let us also start this argument at the grass roots level. Thanksgiving day will provide a great opportunity for this with friends and relatives.
I have an idea. Since the Republicans have been unable to persuade the voters who typically vote Democrat, why don't they read this blog, the WSJ, or listen to Larry Kudlow for ideas to present free market capitalism persuasively. How would BO, Reid, Pelosi answer your question of what economic freedom principles are enhanced by raising taxes. Yeah, BO would say it is a matter of fairness, well fairness to a guy who has been unemployed for 6 months or more would be better served by keeping the money in the hands of a person who wants to take a chance that his idea and his energy will create wealth, not just for him but as a business grows for those he hires.
ReplyDelete